Ferguson Missouri

[Kevin C Gore]

Amen brother well put.they will seal their own fate with time.

[Gerald Stanford]

How much time do you think they need?

[Dick Whitmore]

How much time do you think they need?

Along time.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_riots

[Michael Brown]

I find it odd that all witnesses were cross examined to filter out inconsistencies in their stories, yet officer Wilson was not. Proverbs 18:19 says, "In a lawsuit the first to speak seems right, until someone comes forward and cross-examines.

[Michael Rosamond]

I find it odd that all witnesses were cross examined to filter out inconsistencies in their stories, yet officer Wilson was not. Proverbs 18:19 says, "In a lawsuit the first to speak seems right, until someone comes forward and cross-examines.

Their testimony's where compared to the physical evidence and did not match. Many of them described him being shot in the back while running away. That was not true. Many of them said there was not a struggle in the car but there was. All of those testimonies were compared to the physical evidence and found false. The officers testimony matched the physical evidence.

I would bet most of these whiteness probably didn't even seen it happen. At first they could only find a couple and none of them except the guy with him said they seen the whole thing. Then a week later they are coming out of the wood work. The kid with him first reported that the officer ask them to step out of the street, he said when they didn't he jumped out of his car and just started shooting. We know that was a lie so how do you believe his second or third stories? Now we know he was standing right there but he didn't see him punching the officer in the face? Give me a break.

[Michael Brown]

No sir! You're dead wrong. The officers story had several inconsistencies in it and most generally is equally cross examined in grand jury cases. The prosecutors were prosecuting Michael Brown and there was nobody to cross examine the officer. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nati ... story.html. http://nworeport.me/2014/11/26/officer- ... literally/. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... story.html. http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ ... story.html

[Michael Rosamond]

No sir! You're dead wrong. The officers story had several inconsistencies in it and most generally is equally cross examined in grand jury cases. The prosecutors were prosecuting Michael Brown and there was nobody to cross examine the officer. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nati ... story.html. http://nworeport.me/2014/11/26/officer- ... literally/. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... story.html. http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ ... story.html

Michael do you know what the difference is in fact based journalism and an editorial opinion piece? Because the links you posted are opinion pieces that attacked the officer and the only inconstancy that was found was he was wrong about how many shots were fired in the car. None of those pieces. Not one asked or commented about all of the witnesses getting several facts wrong. Not one. You know why? Because if this went away they would have to find something else to wright about. The same way you are not questioning all that was proven by science to be lies by the witnesses. You are strictly concentrating on what you want to believe is true.

You want to know my personal opinion about what happened? They got into it, the young man knocked the crap out of the cop a couple of times. The cop got pissed off, scared and embarrassed. It then escalated into him shooting Michael Brown, but this is the thing. No matter how terrible it might be, no matter how tragic and wrong we might think it is. He was within his rights by the law to shoot him.

[Michael Brown]

Me and you sir share the exact same opinion of what happened by your description. My problem is the prosecutor steered the grand jury by cross examining the witnesses and not the cop. One thing is certain all of the witnesses say the cop shot at the perp while he was running away. Now, we know none of the bullets hit him from behind, and most witnesses just assumed they did since the cop fired four shots at him while he was running. Ok, officer said he fired one shot inside car immediately after incident. In grand jury he said two shots. The audio of the incident verified that there was one shot fired, a pause, three shots fired and a pause, then four again, finally four more. If cross examined he would've been asked why he said one the first time then two later. Why three shots while he was fleeing. If it was possible that the perps blood got in the car after the shooting. All I'm saying is that there should of been an impartial investigation and grand jury presentation.. The evidence as i see it supports our opinion of them getting into a fight officer getting pissed off and killing suspect

[CJ Thomas]

Kentucky fried chicken was safe... And no work shoes was taken

[Barry Brown]

You want to stop it that's easy. Just take the officer to trial. If he did nothing wrong he will have no problems. This will help settle the people down.

[Darrell Mills]

You want to stop it that's easy. Just take the officer to trial. If he did nothing wrong he will have no problems. This will help settle the people down.

A grand jury( consisting of from 12 to 23 members) is the equivalent of a preliminary trial. They ruled there was not probable cause to send Wilson to trial. Do we want to set a precedent of letting mobs determine our court rulings?

[Michael Brown]

He should've been cross-examined by a non-biased district attorney

[Bruce Janssen]

One simple fact, if the guy did what he was told, he's still alive.

[Merlin Hershberger]

Michael Brown: If that Michael brown would NOT have robbed a store and physically shoved the store person confronting him and f he would have moved to the side of street instead of walking down the middle of the road, would this have happened. Iam a caring father, BUT if my son did the same thing I would have NO mercy on him if he got shot NONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A lot of people are criticizing the cop, but if you were in his shoes, in a struggle for your life, would you not do the same. Sympathy needs to go out to officer brown. The rest of his life will be a nitemare because of one deadbeat thug. His mom and dad should be embarrassed by there sons actions. Also all the race baiters, holder,sharpton,jackson, Obama getting involved was a total disgrace. Some people always look to blame other people,bottom line is , if he wouldn't of robbed a store, and walked on side of street instead of middle of road, he would still be alive. ALL BLAME IS ON HIM!!!!!!

merlin

[Michael Brown]

You sheep just be good, and do exactly what you're told. When the cops come for your freedom and you're the minority remember what you've said "Just be a good boy and do exactly what the cop says and you won't get shot"! None of you guys know that officer Wilson didn't do exactly what the key witness (guy with the deceased) said. Remember, his story was consistent with evidence too.. I'm not defending the guys actions, I just feel an unarmed mans death should go to trial. Or at least have a fair look. Most of you guys don't know cops are trained more on how to get away with killing someone than they're on "de-escalation" tactics..